Uber has published three safety reports covering 2017 through 2022. Together they count 12,522 sexual assaults reported on its platform, 1,207 of them rapes. Lyft's first report, covering 2017 through 2019, counted 4,158 sexual assaults, including 360 rapes. These are the companies' own numbers, and they only include what riders found a way to report. Uber's data also shows who was accused: in its most recent report, the driver was the accused party in 68% of sexual assault reports — and in 90% of the rapes, where nearly nine in ten survivors were women. The setup behind those numbers is the one the apps are built on: a passenger alone in a stranger's car, often at night, sometimes after drinking, with the driver controlling the doors, the route, and where the ride ends. Survivors have described drivers who took them somewhere other than the address they entered, who locked the doors, who groped or exposed themselves, and who raped them — and, again and again, drivers who had already been reported before.
Thousands of riders have now sued. The federal cases are grouped together in one California court — the Uber cases since 2023, the Lyft cases since early 2026 (MDL 3084 and MDL 3171) — with more moving through California state court, and the first trials began in 2026. The lawsuits do not describe a few bad drivers. They say the companies checked drivers against name-based records instead of fingerprints and cleared people who should never have been approved; did little to monitor what happened once a ride was under way; kept drivers on the road after being told about them; never warned riders; and advertised a level of safety they were not delivering. You do not need the driver to have been arrested or convicted to bring a claim.
If an Uber or Lyft driver sexually assaulted, abused, or harassed you during or after a ride, you may be able to bring a claim against the company that put that driver on the road — not only against the driver.

Every detail you share through this case review — what happened, which app and which trip, whether you reported it to the company or to police, any records or treatment history you have, and how it has affected you since — stays between you and our intake team. We do not sell, rent, or share your information with third parties, and your participation is never made public. Survivors in the pending rideshare cases routinely file under “Jane Doe” or “John Doe” pseudonyms to protect their identities.
Damages vary by case, and every survivor's situation is different. Common categories of damages in sexual assault claims against rideshare companies include:
Therapy, trauma-focused counseling, psychiatric care, inpatient stays, medication, and follow-up treatment for PTSD, depression, anxiety, panic disorder, substance use, and the other conditions that commonly follow a sexual assault.
Long-term therapy, ongoing psychiatric treatment, intensive outpatient programs, and the cost of a recovery that often continues for years after the ride itself.
Emergency treatment and forensic examination, injuries caused by the assault or by escaping the vehicle, reproductive and gynecological care, and testing and treatment for sexually transmitted infections.
Wages lost to time off work, medical and court appointments, jobs left or lost because of the trauma, interrupted schooling, and the lasting reduction in earning capacity that can follow a serious assault.
Emotional distress, humiliation, fear, and the loss of trust that follows being assaulted in a locked vehicle by a stranger you were told had been screened and vetted.
The ordinary things the assault took away: traveling alone, working a night shift, going out with friends, relying on a car service to get home, and the relationships and routines that changed afterward.
What you absorbed to stay safe and keep functioning — replacement transportation, moving or breaking a lease, changed work schedules, childcare, security measures, and travel to treatment.
Where the evidence shows a company knew about a risk — a driver already reported, a screening process known to miss disqualifying history — and kept that driver on the road anyway, some states allow damages meant to punish the conduct rather than only compensate the harm.
In cases like these, the rideshare company — not only the driver — may be held accountable for negligent hiring, screening, supervision, and retention of the drivers it puts on the road; for background-check practices that miss or ignore disqualifying history; for failing to act on earlier complaints about the same driver; for failing to warn riders about a risk it already knew about; and for marketing a standard of safety it did not meet. Filing deadlines are set by state law and differ considerably depending on where and when the assault happened, so the only reliable way to know whether your claim is still open is to have it reviewed.
See if You QualifyAt D. Miller & Associates, PLLC, we represent passengers who were sexually assaulted, abused, or harassed by Uber and Lyft drivers, and we review claims from riders nationwide. Our attorneys work closely with each client, with the discretion and care these cases demand, to pursue accountability from the companies that screened those drivers, put them on the road, and kept them there.
Our attorneys handle complex civil cases against large corporate defendants, including claims brought by passengers sexually assaulted by rideshare drivers — cases that turn on what a company knew about a driver, what its screening actually checked, and what it did with the complaints it received. The team reviewing your case has worked in this category before.
We come ready to take cases through to trial when defendants resist a fair resolution. The credible threat of trial is what drives settlements — and it's a posture not every firm can credibly hold.
You pay nothing up front and nothing during the case. Fees only apply if we recover compensation on your behalf.
This is an advertisement of the law firm D. Miller & Associates, PLLC. D. Miller & Associates, PLLC is responsible for this webpage. No representation is made that the lawyers are certified specialists or experts in any field of law. This webpage’s content is provided for informational purposes only by D. Miller & Associates, PLLC. Visit us at carlsonattorneys.com. This site contains general information that may not be up to date, assumes findings of fact, and is for illustrative purposes only. A more detailed analysis of your particular data would be required to obtain a better estimate of what you are owed. There is no guarantee that a Court or Arbitrator would rule in your favor. This does not create a client-attorney relationship. It is not intended to provide legal advice. For legal advice, you will need to consult an attorney at D. Miller & Associates, PLLC. Every case is different. Results depend on the unique law, facts and circumstances of each case.